JJ mentioned in his interview that it was down to minutes played. Sounded like we couldn’t call it off.
18th Sep 2026 11:15:27
[92.lo.gg.ed]
Ex www.wup.me.uk - The home of WU
MAGS - that’s interesting - are we yet sure that the Cambridge game won’t get cancelled?
18th Sep 2026 11:09:05
[104.lo.gg.ed]
Ex www.wup.me.uk - The home of WU
Var would of given the red card, and that comes with a 3 match ban for serious foul play.
18th Sep 2026 10:59:36
[82.lo.gg.ed]
Wonder if any of the other invisible strikers.will be back soon,otherwise sasu up front for 3 games or different tactics
Brighton - I too consoled myself both times by recognising the unlikelihood of us actually scoring from either move, but it was incredibly frustrating to see a referee do this without first checking to judge whether there might be an advantage…
18th Sep 2026 10:59:31
[104.lo.gg.ed]
Ex www.wup.me.uk - The home of WU
Just listened to JJ. Which players won’t be available at Cambridge? I’m guessing Hippo, Johnson?
18th Sep 2026 10:58:20
[80.lo.gg.ed]
And if there’s 3 why isn’t it off?
Shame the ref had no idea at all about playing advantages - we were pulled back twice in really good positions
18th Sep 2026 10:56:43
[5.lo.gg.ed]
Still wouldn’t have scored though 😂
Agreed Trigs - i think though with the aim of avoiding relegation, if we continue to beat the teams in the bottom third and pick up occasional points against the others, we will be alright !
18th Sep 2026 10:55:45
[89.lo.gg.ed]
Ex www.wup.me.uk - The home of WU
If he gets a ban, it should be just one game, even the FA/EFL can see that there isn’t much force and that he is arguably stepping over the guy, but equally it looks avoidable, and let’s face it, they hate us, so a ban seems likely… :(
18th Sep 2026 10:49:54
[104.lo.gg.ed]
Ex www.wup.me.uk - The home of WU
Only caveat to that Hash is if you look at the table (I know it's only 6 games played for most) then our points come from teams currently in 14, 19, 22, 23 and 24th place. Nothing we can do about that everyone plays everyone but we will inevitably hit a run of games against better teams than the franchise and bromley. Nice to have the points on the board for that very reason.
18th Sep 2026 10:48:36
[195.lo.gg.ed]
Ex www.wup.me.uk - The home of WU
Decent start to the season overall. We have picked up points. In previous games at home we have looked a bit shaky and maybe been lucky not to concede however yesterday i don't think we were ever in any danger really. Frannies looked quite poor and we probably should have converted one of our chances (especially the Seddon one?) and if we had been rightly given that clear cut penalty then it would have been a different game. I think both teams were probably satisfied with the point at the end.
18th Sep 2026 10:27:54
[89.lo.gg.ed]
franchise despite all the hype about their squad were probably the worst team we have played at Plough Lane so far this season. Even Newport looked better than them.
I'm sure if an mk player did the same as Stockley we would all be spitting feathers
Sadly a deserved 3 + match ban..
18th Sep 2026 10:22:18
[82.lo.gg.ed]
Ex www.wup.me.uk - The home of WU
It looked accidental to me Spit he was just planting his foot to help the guy up.
18th Sep 2026 10:11:13
[195.lo.gg.ed]
Ex www.wup.me.uk - The home of WU
Of course Stockley will get a ban as unfortunately I've seen some photos of the incident on Facebook with our fans gloating. So you know the mk fans will put pressure on the fa to act:-(
18th Sep 2026 09:58:48
[82.lo.gg.ed]
Ex www.wup.me.uk - The home of WU
I actually thought the ref did quite well last night must be an impossible game to ref decision was hotly disputed
18th Sep 2026 09:56:55
[86.lo.gg.ed]
Ex www.wup.me.uk - The home of WU
Security checks always look worse around the non main stand areas usually they just wave you through in the main stand
18th Sep 2026 09:55:43
[86.lo.gg.ed]
Ex www.wup.me.uk - The home of WU
I would doubt the security checks will spread/escalate - not exactly like we see/hear a mounting list of people bringing in contraband items. Personally not sure it's even necessary for that fixture but I understand the duty of care and it possibly helps to balance out security checks on the plastic fans so as not to show discrimination against the morally challenged.
18th Sep 2026 09:53:23
[195.lo.gg.ed]
4 clean sheets and 8 points at a possible 12 at home is a solid start to the season. We could do with being stronger in attack but we created chances yesterday which is more than can be said about other games so far. Only caught a little of the game yesterday but the referee was very poor. Way too quick to whistle and what's the point of this 5 second rule at throw ins. Never actually used.
18th Sep 2026 09:47:35
[10.lo.gg.ed]
Ex www.wup.me.uk - The home of WU
Missed TWO golden chances first half, gotta convert at least one of those......being 'kettled' by the police on the way to the station afterwrads so the away fans could leave was unfortunate!
18th Sep 2026 09:33:12
[2.lo.gg.ed]
Ex www.wup.me.uk - The home of WU
OI - security checks were just the wand, which I guess picks up metal like knives and guns (I brought neither on this occasion, so they let me in…) - basically the same as you get at court when you’re on jury service, minus the walk-through arch thingy…
18th Sep 2026 09:32:52
[86.lo.gg.ed]
Ex www.wup.me.uk - The home of WU
Some of them came as empty seats
18th Sep 2026 09:26:02
[86.lo.gg.ed]
Ex www.wup.me.uk - The home of WU
A4E - they do do retrospective bans in Div 1. If they do one, sadly I fear he will get a ban
18th Sep 2026 09:25:43
[80.lo.gg.ed]
Ex www.wup.me.uk - The home of WU
Anyone know how many Franchise fans - clearly not the 950/sold out they are claiming
18th Sep 2026 09:24:05
[80.lo.gg.ed]
What were the security checks Laurence? Pat downs?
18th Sep 2026 09:15:47
[81.lo.gg.ed]
Ex www.wup.me.uk - The home of WU
On This Day in 1965
