I'm hoping that most teams want to play in black and green against us when we are on our travels, its gastly... I reckon Private Office Asset Management Ltd didn't fancy what should have been the third kit

They're on the OS now. The 3rd kit looks the best of them to me. Somewhat tempted to buy last season's home shirt instead - in hindsight, it was excellent. Second kit will inevitably be come to known as the prisoner of war child shirt.

That yellow shirt looks more like it

Third shirt [Link]

Thanks Meadow. Meh....

Ignore ‘from’

Are we trending to darker blue home kits to gradually reclaim the ‘90s from navy?

Why the plaque with Italian writing?

DD [Link] [Link]

Isn't it only a hoop if it continues around the back? If it stops at the seam then it's a stripe.

Horizontal stripes are hoops

Not on the OS DD.

Am I missing something - where are these pictures of the new kit?

Not a fan of either kit but not particularly bothered by either, either.

That away kit LOOOOL

I don't like collars on football shirts. Back to watermelon for the away shirt, horizontal stripes this time. Yuk!

a4e i accept your point - but life is always about priorities. It doesn't matter how much money one has there are always decisions to be made based on priorities. That's a good thing - life would be very dull if one could afford everything.

Awful kit. No shape to it (or is that a pic of XXXXXL size?). Collar = yuck!

Meadow do you mean you don’t like collars on footy tops or just this one? For me it’d work better if the blue and yellow were switched so the yellow goes up to the edge of the collar and makes it stand out more

What Meadow said about the new kit.

JG - I'd be happy with it if you could but then there are a lot of things that would make me happy that aren't going to happen ;)

Hash, I love the detail but I don't like the collar.

You’re missing the point - for many people doubling ticket prices would mean EITHER going to all the games but going to zero gigs all year, OR (more likely) only bothering to go to half of the games (or fewer…) in a season because you’ve got to keep some funds for the gigs you want to go to. You’re in a position that means you don’t need to make that choice because you can afford all the games and all the gigs you want - most people aren’t in that luxurious position… 🤷🏻‍♂️

Mark L: does it really matter what other clubs charge - so long as we had the demand to sell out at whatever price we determine. Are you prepared to let the markets supply and demand dictate the price or are you going to interefere in the market to enable everyone (how so ever they determine to prioritise their expenditure) to be able to come to all home matches?

Silk - obviously they might only go to one Texas gig but they will see other bands throughout the year, go to the theayre, cinema, eat out etc etc. I have no idea how many people would spend £1000+ a year watching Wimbledon but those that cpuldn"t would just go to less matches. Watching Wimbledon is hardly an essential item of ecpenditure. However assuming you could fill the existing 8000 capacity of the stadium at an average of £45 would you be in favour or against?