Today Tomorrow Wed 26 Thu 27 Fri 28 Sat 29 Sun 30
#BringTheDonsHome
#BringTheDonsHome
#BringTheDonsHome
#BringTheDonsHome
#BringTheDonsHome
AFCW v Cambridge Utd (FL2) k.o 15:00
#BringTheDonsHome
+ Happy Birthday Moke +
Enter e-mail and Tag To Login
Paper's Crowd Count
Last 5 minutes : 6
Last 24 hours : 2930
Refresh Clear Form
   
You are on page 6658. Click the red cross to clear.
Old Isthmian, I get the impression that quite a few would rather stay at KM as supposed to over stretching financially for the greyhound site development?
11th Dec 2012 15:39:13 
[188.lo.gg.ed] 
www.wup.me.uk - The home of WUPixels
Basingstoke A chance to support your team, I've been hanging on for 50yrs+
11th Dec 2012 15:39:02 
[193.lo.gg.ed] 
keefy
www.wup.me.uk - The home of WUPixels
Sleepy - leaked from a DT Board member possibly? Or as treebs says, a rumour. ;)
11th Dec 2012 15:38:53 
[10.lo.gg.ed] 
I blame social networking and peeps talking in pubs! :o)
I see that the Max Porter shirt has yet to be claimed by the prizewinner. Good luck with getting somebody to come forward for that.
11th Dec 2012 15:38:10 
[79.lo.gg.ed] 
www.wup.me.uk - The home of WUPixels
Sleepy Womble: er, a rumour?
11th Dec 2012 15:35:30 
[193.lo.gg.ed] 
:oP
$6m dollar man. I couldn't agree more with your post.
11th Dec 2012 15:34:51 
[79.lo.gg.ed] 
I did go to the MK match, it doesn't change my view on how our club should be run and controlled.
There would need to be a much greater interest in the DT before we were in any danger of selling out. I'm not sure people realise quite how difficult undertaking a restricted action will be. I suspect we'll discover if/when we want to move to New PLough Lane and it takes a lot of organising even to get that through.
11th Dec 2012 15:34:50 
[62.lo.gg.ed] 
www.wup.me.uk - The home of WUPixels
Trebs - "Rumour has it resolution 10 won't be voted on" - where does that come from?
11th Dec 2012 15:33:18 
[194.lo.gg.ed] 
www.wup.me.uk - The home of WUPixels
$6MDM - difficult to argue with your posts. I must say the willingness of so many of our fans and hangers on to head up the M1 to the wankbowl took me back and made me less enthusiastic about AFCW generally.
11th Dec 2012 15:30:07 
[10.lo.gg.ed] 
it's just football and a chance to escape the wife for many I suppose
oops - read that wrong. turns out that the club has lent someone a watch - nice of them if hardly breaking news...
11th Dec 2012 15:26:25 
[83.lo.gg.ed] 
www.wup.me.uk - The home of WUPixels
I want to watch football safe in the knowledge that my club is safe and I am not going to be sold down the river. I don't want to put a lot emotional investment into the play thing of somebody who "wants to have some fun" or has more money than sense and is on an ego trip. Once we let external investors in, that is it. Safeguards can be broken. Sydney Black put the safeguard of a pre-emption clause on Plough Lane and look at the good it did when Sham conned Merton Council into lifting it. Once outside influence takes hold, you can't bring it in house again. Even if you gave power to a "good guy" with a requirement the club has first refusal to buy it back again, could it afford to? My view is live within your means and don't get yourself in that position to start with.
11th Dec 2012 15:20:53 
[85.lo.gg.ed] 
If that means we end up bobbing between L2 and the Conference so be it. Football is football at any level, albeit with a few more mistakes at our level.
Those loan watches look smart - might get myself one of those.
11th Dec 2012 15:19:12 
[83.lo.gg.ed] 
d'ya know what time it is? what time it is?
Actually, it's not just the pitch: they own Stamford Bridge: [Link] I met two of them at a family funeral a while back and they were really up in arms about the actions of their club in trying to 'bully' them into selling.
11th Dec 2012 15:10:13 
[193.lo.gg.ed] 
www.wup.me.uk - The home of WUPixels
I mean, look at the 'to do' between Abramovich and the Chelsea fans who own their share of the Stamford Bridge pitch. He knows that he doesn't really have full control until he gets that pitch. Good on those Chelsea fans who are refusing to sell to him.
11th Dec 2012 15:07:38 
[193.lo.gg.ed] 
www.wup.me.uk - The home of WUPixels
Sharif- Martin Angha if he's still available. I got him on a free so give it a try. Also Jann Nsaku and Rob Kiernan. Got them all on frees and have been epic.
11th Dec 2012 15:07:05 
[99.lo.gg.ed] 
www.wup.me.uk - The home of WUPixels
I doubt any benefactor would be interested if they didn't get the ground, too.
11th Dec 2012 15:06:54 
[193.lo.gg.ed] 
www.wup.me.uk - The home of WUPixels
I have to agree with you SMDM I'm not into the politics of the club. Just want to watch football. I think your opinion is similar to mine if some rich benefactor turned up like Abramavich and wanted to take us to the Prem would be all be voting against it? I think the small minority that basically run the club would be surprised. Money talks if it is backed up. Lets face it Sham the man had little and made a tidy sum selling us down the river.We were never a rich club we had a non league ground. We lost it all for a poxy retail park in M.K.
11th Dec 2012 15:06:02 
[94.lo.gg.ed] 
windsor don
Getting a benefactor that has money and morals and don't let them get hold off any assets like the stadium.
Rumour has it resolution 10 won't be voted on.
11th Dec 2012 15:05:51 
[193.lo.gg.ed] 
www.wup.me.uk - The home of WUPixels
The two contentious issues seem to be taking us in opposite directions, one enhancing the hold the DT has on the club, the other diluting it. I still think fan ownership matters as will be seen when people want us to change our name or move, even to New Plough Lane.
11th Dec 2012 15:00:17 
[62.lo.gg.ed] 
www.wup.me.uk - The home of WUPixels
Trebor - sorry, was reading something else with "average" in it and proved how shit I am at multi-tasking...
11th Dec 2012 14:56:54 
[109.lo.gg.ed] 
Well, either that or it was one helluva slip of the tongue
I like chatting to Ivor to be fair
11th Dec 2012 14:56:29 
[62.lo.gg.ed] 
www.wup.me.uk - The home of WUPixels
Leddrede - having one fan there shocked the opposition support so much that it silenced them, meaning the one fan outshouted them and therefore drove Udinese to victory...
11th Dec 2012 14:55:36 
[109.lo.gg.ed] 
Probably
REPD: only 2-3 average players? But we have so many!
11th Dec 2012 14:55:30 
[193.lo.gg.ed] 
I presume you meant 'over age'?
How did Udinese manage to win with only 1 supporter? Answers please from those who said that the level of support makes a difference to team performance.
11th Dec 2012 14:54:24 
[212.lo.gg.ed] 
Watford B team.
Bob is right Sharif. C Mac can't hear us shouting at him on football manager ;-)
11th Dec 2012 14:38:46 
[188.lo.gg.ed] 
www.wup.me.uk - The home of WUPixels