Leddrede, why is further proof of what we already know so worrying? Far greater concern is the deluded group think around 'the global energy transition' and the ill considered, inflationary and ineffective way it's being approached.

Airports are an outlier. Entirely correct that if you behave like a security threat inside an airport then security properly fucks you up. Good kicking from the police is the least you should expect, provided you are indeed posing a genuine threat. Lucky they didn't get tazed or shot. Plenty of other places to act like a prick.

RiP, John Mayall.

Surprised AAH isn’t in the Iraq squad

Let's hope it warms up soon,save on them expensive net zero energy bills

I'd say the most worrying news of the day is the covering up of the stabbed soldier being clased as mental health rather than the terrorist attack that it clearly is.

I see Toby Sibbick has been signed by Wigan, thereby rescuing him from Scottish football 😀

The most worrying news of the day: [Link]

Olympic football that should be

Iraq vs Ukraine on Eurosport now frogs vs yanks later moly-if football already

goal disallowed scotty

Argentina v Morocco suspended after Argentina equalised in the 16th minute (!) of additional time. Apparently still 3 minutes to go and will be played behind closed doors.

He was okay defensively; still learning. To be honest, if we play wing backs I want them to be attacking (hate what can be five at the back) so he's being given the opportunity to try a role. In that formation the only other option is as a striker. Not my favoured position for him and we already have four. Wide on both sides is where I'm most concerned about this team. It needs the like's of Sasu to take the chance.

BTW was reading our OS, the South London Press, about Jackson talking about how Sasu played as wing-back. Why on earth are we playing an inexperienced winger/forward as a wing-back against a vastly superior side. Isn't that asking for disaster?

In the 45 years since Thatcher got in we have had a Conservative Prime Minister for 32 of them (70% of time). So any bias from the BBC is clearly ineffectual in backing either Labour or the left. Anyone with a working brain cell would see that BBC ,as it is, does not harm the Tories. In fact the biggest enemy to the Tories is the Tory Party itself

It wasn't pdf that put me off but IEA, although as IEA documents go (they were Truss's biggest backers) it is actually only marginally biased against the BBC. A few valid points, but some idiotic ideas, for example, about Thought For The Day (Christians are just too demanding about camels and eyes of needles apparently).

[Link] this is a pretty decent read on the BBC bias debate. It's a pdf download, so that's not your thing then don't click on it. It's from the IEA

Mind wouldn't be surprised if there are riots after the video circulation

Postman,good policing if you don't comply to police orders a kick and stamp might make others comply next time

Spit you'll never know, they don't talk about things like that...😆

Oh dear not going to well at Manchester airport on social sites

Wonder how much that cost for the review on club communication 🤔

Bring back corona bottles

It’s a marathon not a snickers

They definitely will KD, but good for people to pace themselves as it looks like a long road.