Today Tomorrow Mon 03 Tue 04 Wed 05 Thu 06 Fri 07







Enter e-mail and Tag To Login
Paper's Crowd Count
Last 5 minutes : 23
Last 24 hours : 2838
Refresh Clear Form
   
You are on page 9. Click the red cross to clear.
In a hypothetical world, what would you be looking for TF? Obviously last year's election wouldn't be rerun, most of the winners have either quit or been re-elected anyway. I'm not sure a rerun of this year's election would be worthwhile. So apologies? Rule changes, which are being put forward anyway? The chance to fill the casual vacancy?
29th Oct 2025 10:27:59 
[86.lo.gg.ed] 
Ex www.wup.me.uk - The home of WU
How arrogant to think that amount would prohibit you from continuing as I’m guessing they have no idea of your financial circumstances
29th Oct 2025 09:46:03 
[78.lo.gg.ed] 
Ex www.wup.me.uk - The home of WU
That reads like a poorly veiled threat.
29th Oct 2025 09:33:43 
[82.lo.gg.ed] 
Time to do some digging..
This “the suggested £2,000 deposit was a large enough sum to make him think very carefully about proceeding” bit is something I find disturbing (I’m assuming it’s a verbatim quote, yes?) - it implies that there is an agenda to price somebody out of a potential route to justice. There’s a word for it, but I can’t think of it….
29th Oct 2025 09:27:27 
[104.lo.gg.ed] 
Ex www.wup.me.uk - The home of WU
Ideally the FSA would provide low cost, independent arbitration but there would always be some concern about just how independent they were.
29th Oct 2025 09:20:09 
[86.lo.gg.ed] 
which is a pity
Independant guest book at that. Freedom of speech within the law is essential in these troubled times.
29th Oct 2025 08:54:33 
[45.lo.gg.ed] 
Ex www.wup.me.uk - The home of WU
Lefties at AFC Wimbledon shut down their own supporters Guestbook!!😂😂😂😂
29th Oct 2025 08:50:19 
[82.lo.gg.ed] 
Daily Mail
spit_the_dog
Read all about it;-)
Laurence - why is arbitration so expensive? If we can't find arbitration routes that don't involve thousands of pounds (maybe far more than 5K apparently) we have a problem that the arbitration defined in the constitution is only available to the rich, which surely must be totally against fan owned principles.
29th Oct 2025 08:46:53 
[86.lo.gg.ed] 
Ex www.wup.me.uk - The home of WU
I'm not against criticism of the DTB, in fact the DTB if they have any sense aren't against criticism of the DTB. And if it is not defamatory, any threats should be pushed back against. What is bad is material that does look suffiiciently defamatory that it can be used as a threat against WUP so think about that before posting.
29th Oct 2025 08:39:16 
[86.lo.gg.ed] 
Ex www.wup.me.uk - The home of WU
when did £5,000 become a reasonable sum compared with £500, one wonders?
29th Oct 2025 08:38:59 
[80.lo.gg.ed] 
Ex www.wup.me.uk - The home of WU
it is strange to think we are all AFC Wimbledon supporters.
29th Oct 2025 08:34:00 
[80.lo.gg.ed] 
The DT was about giving a voice to supporters. It appears your voice might be louder depending on how deep are your pockets?
Trigg - I wonder what “alternative routes forward” means…. 🧐 It would have been better (and more polite/respectful, I’d argue) if that had been followed by “…such as, for example…”, and then a list of some of the alternatives….. Without that, it’s just too vague, and not helpful in any sense as far as I can see… 🤷🏻‍♂️
29th Oct 2025 07:27:19 
[104.lo.gg.ed] 
Good post, Meadow - we want this place to continue please, so do please tell us if/when you feel we have crossed a line… 👍
Meadow- that’s good to hear. People love this place and it wouldn’t be fair to the majority to risk it being shut down
29th Oct 2025 07:16:14 
[104.lo.gg.ed] 
It’s a tough job you guys have, appreciate the time and effort you’re putting in to keep it going
Jumped up little Garden gnome
29th Oct 2025 07:11:38 
[5.lo.gg.ed] 
dave skinner
Knotty ash
My priority is keeping WUP up and running. Any anti DTB posts are likely to get pressure to close it down. All Shane's posts are pretty reasonable but I'm not going to sticky them. That would endorse them and I have to remain neutral.
28th Oct 2025 23:40:41 
[95.lo.gg.ed] 
Ex www.wup.me.uk - The home of WU
I am not happy that the Dons Trust are happy to risk losing £10,000 plus of AFCW supporters money to try to defend the indefensible. They should see sense and climb down now, before this is plastered all over press and they have to climb down anyway but in front of a much wider audience.
28th Oct 2025 23:10:06 
[109.lo.gg.ed] 
There are none so blind as they that cannot see.
I don't think the actions of several people wrapped around this bullshit can collectively hide behind this and invoke a legal shield that the trust can cover, having chewed this over with a law bud.
28th Oct 2025 21:47:10 
[109.lo.gg.ed] 
Chewing fat trig but either pick one off - or pick a hack that's not polluted by the rabid leftist Buckingham Babes and let's bring this crap into the light
I was hoping a rich person would bung Shane £10000, Spit.
28th Oct 2025 21:21:42 
[51.lo.gg.ed] 
Ex www.wup.me.uk - The home of WU
Moderators please allow Triggers sticky
28th Oct 2025 21:19:13 
[78.lo.gg.ed] 
Ex www.wup.me.uk - The home of WU
Surely galty will stump up 10k against the co-operative 😂
28th Oct 2025 21:14:19 
[82.lo.gg.ed] 
Ex www.wup.me.uk - The home of WU
Today has certainly helped Pads.
28th Oct 2025 21:06:33 
[195.lo.gg.ed] 
Ex www.wup.me.uk - The home of WU
I'm afraid OI and Karen are probably right, Trig.
28th Oct 2025 21:04:56 
[51.lo.gg.ed] 
Ex www.wup.me.uk - The home of WU
Trebor - Kris was allowed to get away with that, only he didn't - Tom got elected he failed! The ESG at that time asked him not to indulge in personal attacks on other candidates but didn't force the issue to try and have a free and vibrant election.
28th Oct 2025 21:01:43 
[86.lo.gg.ed] 
if given the opportunity the membership can make wise decisions
I remember many years ago Kris Stewart asked me to nominate him for the DTB and I agreed, then I saw his manifesto in which he basically said, "Don't vote for Tom Adam - he's a bit shit, isn't he?" I wouldn't have nominated him if I'd known that! But there has to be a way that DTB members and other candidates are allowed to say "I don't think I could work with this person" and then the electorate deciding, rather than the ESG positioning itself as arbiter?
28th Oct 2025 20:50:38 
[82.lo.gg.ed] 
Ex www.wup.me.uk - The home of WU
Shane they should not have any say whatsoever
28th Oct 2025 20:48:42 
[78.lo.gg.ed] 
Ex www.wup.me.uk - The home of WU