Seems the usual crowd on Facebook think Jackson should be sacked. Honestly football fans really have entitlement down to a T

Lurker, Yes but Jackson will stay loyal to Reeves and play for a draw.

The use clauses around the stadium and the existing flat structure mean the land probably isn’t as attractive as some may think. Agree with TF. If you’re a football club investor you’ll take the club cheap and be able to put more into budgets.

Reeves stopped being first choice months ago. Was quite impressed with Nelson when he came on. Problem is that’s the first time I’ve seen him take on a game like that. If he can play like that I’d have him starting last 2 games.

How long left on Jackson's contract? Cannot see him staying though. Even if we stay he'll have a crap budget again.

Yeah no way will Jackson be sacked but I expect him to get a better offer regardless of whether we stay up or go down

Disagree Silk. If I’m a serious investor looking at option 1: hand over a sum of money but still have minority control vs option 2: pick up a club on the cheap and then invest money directly to where it matters then as long as that happens quickly enough the cash injection could overcome a L2 points deduction or bounce us back out of the National League.

Saw Roy Keane going on about how Declan Rice is not a top player as he has never taken a game by the scruff of the neck when they aren't playing well. There is an acceptance that when you are fighting for titles or against relegation you need your top senior pros to run games and spur on your team-mates by example. For us that means Jake Reeves will have to be that leader if we want to stay up.

A4e I think people are talking about JJ choosing to go rather than being sacked.

OI - if there are investors they will not wait until we go into administration. The points deduction will probably see us into non-league. So if we go into administration there are no serious investors and we are fubared

Are we not all mouth breathers?

I know players steal a metre or two at throws but today was a piss take. With that mouth breather prick enabling it. I don’t think Plymouth took a single throw within 10m of where it went out. Worst in the first half was 3 times they had a throw, 2 pitch stripes into their half. And he tamely followed their player as he walked 20+m into our half to take it. And I never realised they could apply a second rule that if you get the ball back into play going out doesn’t count. And how Seddon was the only one done for a foul throw bemuses me as well. What’s the point in having rules.

A4e worse than pointless, would self destructive. We know the current set up can produce top half performances with a fully fit squad.

Well done Seagulls for equaliser in 90+5

Silk - that it totally illogical unless you believe the current investor interest is either fictional or based on forcing us into administration so they can get the land. If there is anyone interested in investing now, we'd be a far better bet when we went into admin.

Looking on the bright side, it's still in our hands - all we need to do is match Exeter's results - and only for two games

Sacking JJ when the injury list is so long would be pointless imo…

Trigger look at where Jackson and Cope got us first half of season with fuck all money and a small squad. Someone will look at that and figure he could do a job with decent money and players.

Spurs go Spursy.

Correction - it’s 2-2 now 😂

Spurs winning so looks like there will be no West Ham vs Millwall game next season as it stands…

Decent header from the keeper

Tough to watch but look at the difference in the body language [Link]

League

[Link] Bottom of the leadue