You are on page 5. Click the red cross to clear.
I see Argentine Grill is up for sale. Fully fitted restaurant lease available on Haydons Road, London SW19 8JZ. Furniture and kitchen equipment included.
9th Sep 2026 07:41:25
[92.lo.gg.ed]
Ex www.wup.me.uk - The home of WU
Wow I’ve just seen the reaction from the Facebook fan groups to the latest bond update. When that lot turn on you the game is up.
8th Sep 2026 23:21:16
[195.lo.gg.ed]
Ex www.wup.me.uk - The home of WU
I imagine somewhere in the small print there are the warnings about default. I've no criticism of anyone who believes 5% is fair for the risk, that is their decision. I think it is well into double figures. Personally it isn't an issue as I make no 5 year commitments any more, wine has to be drinkable in fewer years!
8th Sep 2026 22:46:31
[81.lo.gg.ed]
Ex www.wup.me.uk - The home of WU
Where is it shown in the accounts Timmy? Be good to see how it is shown.
8th Sep 2026 22:37:44
[195.lo.gg.ed]
Ex www.wup.me.uk - The home of WU
Accounted for yes. Explained no.
8th Sep 2026 22:29:42
[195.lo.gg.ed]
Silk - is it being kept quiet for legal reasons? If so the legal costs we must have incurred by now will dwarf the amount. Lazy rumour spreading won’t get the money back. I’ve seen the “give” reactions of multiple board members when asked about the missing money - there’s no legal case there’s just fear.
There is plenty of stuff out there to disclose our financial position- not least the annual accounts. They make it quite clear that we are structurally loss-making and have substantial cash outflows. If someone buys the bond then the club will simply (and truthfully) say that the financial position has been disclosed to them- realistically only someone who isn’t paying attention to the risks, or doesn’t care because they want to support the club, will buy the bond, hence the poor take up.
8th Sep 2026 22:27:57
[81.lo.gg.ed]
Ex www.wup.me.uk - The home of WU
I think the 400k has been accounted for in full already, so won’t impact going forward.
8th Sep 2026 22:21:06
[94.lo.gg.ed]
Ex www.wup.me.uk - The home of WU
TF - I am not too sure we have to disclose where it went and especially if it is being kept quiet for legal reasons. We just have have to disclose its loss.
8th Sep 2026 22:15:52
[82.lo.gg.ed]
Ex www.wup.me.uk - The home of WU
RK - in order to sell this bond then I would believe the club believes it can meet that the upcoming bond repayment. Because selling a new bond when you know you cannot meet the current one is in the illegal territory and could land people being behind bars IYSWIM
8th Sep 2026 22:13:48
[82.lo.gg.ed]
I cannot believe that we would do such a thing.
If they have to fully disclose their financial position then where’s the £400k gone and are we getting it back?
8th Sep 2026 22:04:27
[195.lo.gg.ed]
(I do understand your point and I also don’t think we’re in immediate danger of administration as there is the option of an expensive loan)
Staring at us straight in the face is a potential bond repayment of upto £2.5m with only £0.6m so far secured and you say there is no risk!
8th Sep 2026 22:02:37
[86.lo.gg.ed]
Ex www.wup.me.uk - The home of WU
Deflection - it's the current modus operandi.
8th Sep 2026 22:02:13
[31.lo.gg.ed]
Ex www.wup.me.uk - The home of WU
TF - the club has to fully disclose their current financial position and risks when selling the bonds. They cannot hide anything they know that would prevent them repaying the bond. Does this means the bonds are safe? No. But they would have to go into the sale with an honest belief that they will be safe.
8th Sep 2026 22:01:11
[82.lo.gg.ed]
Ex www.wup.me.uk - The home of WU
Chill ,apparently we are going to be rich soon.
8th Sep 2026 21:59:43
[82.lo.gg.ed]
Ex www.wup.me.uk - The home of WU
Not sure that really makes much logical sense Silk but I’m sure they appreciate your effort.
8th Sep 2026 21:56:02
[195.lo.gg.ed]
Ex www.wup.me.uk - The home of WU
As the club is selling a financial product then they should by law have to disclose anything they know that would prevent the bond from being repaid. This would mean unless they do not have anything other than the usual bumf about risk they do not have anything to indicate there is a risk.
8th Sep 2026 21:47:03
[82.lo.gg.ed]
That indicates there is no known belief of imminent bankruptcy
For Old Isthmian - We are top of the league, say we are top of the league ...
8th Sep 2026 21:43:00
[31.lo.gg.ed]
... you did come fishin' :-)
I suspect the minority investors may be Mr JG and more of his wealthy friends.
8th Sep 2026 21:23:09
[195.lo.gg.ed]
Ex www.wup.me.uk - The home of WU
"Blank check" should be "Blank cheque" there - sorry, it was a mis-typing rather than me suddenly turning American.
8th Sep 2026 20:29:42
[81.lo.gg.ed]
Ex www.wup.me.uk - The home of WU
OI - you can also argue that if we become dependent on an investor to fund our ongoing losses then they will have "de facto" control of the club, as they could always get their way by simply threatening to cut off the funding tap. That said, I agree that any rational investor who is funding our ongoing losses is going to want some form of operational control agreement, whatever the theoretical voting rights attached to their shareholding, nobody gives a blank check to an organisation they can't control.
8th Sep 2026 20:28:14
[81.lo.gg.ed]
Ex www.wup.me.uk - The home of WU