I can understand why they want to get people to vote for both meetings at once as it is easier to motivate people with "one and done" but the second votes are not guaranteed to take place so it is slightly odd.

“Nobody can speak more than once” is absolutely pathetic.

Popped in and wondered what people were talking about so visited the Trust website. I notice that some people have been busy making more bureaucracy in terms of standing orders. Glanced through, and happened to see they're suggesting that anyone proposing a resolution can only speak for three minutes, and anyone else for only two minutes, and nobody can speak more than once (generally speaking). That seems ... Unlikely.

That’s the point WJ - it’s totally confusing and hard to know what’s what - and that’s even before you actually get into what’s being voted for.

Email from Trust very confusing, Thanks George

Before anyone else jumps up & down and accuses the DT secretariat of yet another cock-up. Please note that the p(r)oxy voting form covers both SGMs - page 1 is the first, page 2 is the second

“ Are we in safe hands? Why are the Supporters Trust sitting on their hands, and why are the people who saved the football club now treating the supporters with utter contempt? Luton Town fans are, in the main, understanding and loyal supporters who, with honesty and transparency, will cope with the road ahead. 

That isn’t the case any longer, and the biggest reason, in my opinion, that we find ourselves with large parts of the fanbase disconnected from the club is the communication off the field. A problem the football club highlighted and hasn’t fixed, if anything, it’s only got worse. Change is needed, either draw a line and hold our hands up and implement meaningful change or hire a proper team for off-the-field operations”

How would a challenge work in League 1? Would they rush up and ask the Sky Sports crew to play it back in slow motion for the referee? It may or may not be a good idea where you already have VAR but is of course another delay to the game. Works best in US sports (or cricket), which are full of natural breaks.

Will football ever join the 21st century? "English football chiefs want to explore using a coach's challenge for subjective VAR decisions. As usual, other sports are there ahead of the dinosaurs. After all, there are more important things to act upon such as a very naughty player taking his shirt off after scoring and not worry about football becoming like all-in wrestling.

Mrs SB and daughter have just landed after a three country visit in South America. Suspect that two of the highlights for them will have been watching Boca Juniors play Platense at La Bombonera stadium and Flamengo taking on Madureira at the Maracana.

Fuck that! Vote? Very unlikely!

Sorry for all the typos at 2 minutes to midnight. It's been a long day. "hope for a 50% of" should be "hope for 50% of". "you can vote seemingly vote again" should be "you can seemingly vote again" and "decision makes" should be "decision makers".

I'd be interested to know what the ethos of the Trust is. The only time it's mentioned is for the DTb (or representative) to use as a marker for deciding if someone can be refused membership.

If the DTB hope for a 50% of members to trawl through all those documents and vote, with 75% voting in favour, then good luck with that. To be able to vote twice now (the whole point of the 2nd vote is a cooling off period, notwithstanding you can vote seemingly vote again if you change your mind) seems counterintuitive to me. I was against 50.01% because it is kicking the can down the road (despite the hope for an anchor partner). Selfishly, if it allows me to carry on watching games for a few more seasons before it all unravels again then so be it, so even though I have zero faith in the decision makes I'll roll the dice and hope for the best.

People want to check their spam folder. My voting form went to that rather than inbox

Confused doesn’t even begin to cut it. Gobsmacked comes close. What an absolute farce.

Anyone else confused by the voting options via the link from the latest DTB email about voting on 3 resolutions? Seem to then be able to vote on 5 resolutions at least 2 of which appear to be the same resolution.

Could be that they got the numbers the wrong way round and meant the 72nd minute, or that they meant the 27th minute of the second half - which is also the 72nd minute.

Makes sense, cheers Timmy.

Think he’s alluding to the club email earlier today that said Stevens scored in the 27th minute

Would possibly help if you gave us a clue what you're talking about, Naz ...

I thought Super Matt scored in the second half. Another example of lack of proofing. Happens too often.

Those Joreans get everywhere 😀

League tomorrow, FA cup Friday

Carsh, the Ivorians v Korea would be hosted at Plough Lane as their is a big jorean population in New Malden