Ah, thanks. I'm not really one for constitutional procedures...

Those the rules Rob and same as sale of KM as per constitution. First hurdle to get 50% of members, was the hard one, esp with expanded membership

Rob it's a restricted action so needs two votes, like the back in two ticks thing. IIRC the threshold for the 2ns vote is lower so we can assume this is through given the landslide and ease with which it has passed all three thresholds in the 1st vote.

Avoids administration in the short term. Now have to see who’s willing to pay how much.

Good news and congrats to DTB and for their annoying emails that got to one or two ;-/

Reading that, there's a second SGM needed to confirm it?

Confirmed [Link]

7500 trust members,so 4500 voted

££££££££

Afternoon all. What is a 60% turnout in terms of numbers?

Excellent news if true [Link]

Meadow - maybe it's time you just stuck to football and not how the club is run.

Could you give us a clue or a little hint, Naz? It’s very exciting.

CW (last night)... not for the guestbook. Over a pint.

As per last night it’s ok OI I understand your decision to remove the content even if I disagree with it. Wasn’t exactly a hill I was willing to die on.

I’d say we’re probably less poorly run than most other clubs rather than well run

We are a well run club,other clubs and investors are impressed how well run we are, . They obviously missed the ticket chaos of a few years ago, the 400k , the treatment of some volunteers, and im sure their are other examples.:-)

Apparently the relaxed demeanour of the DTb last night suggested yes. It was also implied that if your vote was impacted by the technical issues then it was your fault

Result out today, will it pass the 50% turnout, if not game over.

Are we assuming then that the threshold for 50.01 passing was met?

Laurence, 100%

It was so disappointing trying to listen online last night. Ok not many but some people might have wanted to hear the discussion before deciding, so in that sense the whole thing should have been cancelled because fans were not able to be informed enough to cast their vote. Some points I got were ... One member of the board said they voted no last time but are voting yes this time because times have changed...oh ok... Another member said things will not be perfect, we wont get everything we want... at this point I was not filled with confidence! There was a good question about where potential investment would be spent and an informative answer from Graham about the fact that investors will put their proposals together and will have a say about where their money is spent so we cannot say x will be spent on playing budget etc YET. What was also interesting was that if the 50.1 goes through, we will still vote on the investors proposals. They will be put to us by the board and we will then vote. I think this would have been really useful to know sooner (I did watch the last meeting as well and cannot recall this) For people considering voting against, this is important, that we might still reject a proposal from an investor in the future if we are not happy with the offer. Other than that I cannot really recall any other key points as it just kept cutting out. This meeting did provide interesting talking points , but this should have happened sooner to inform voters. Some might have already voted and after last night wanted to change their minds one way or the other...I would understand both !!!

No one watching the stream can tell you what was going on - whenever a half interesting question came up the stream lagged. Only thing of note was that they agreed with protecting club assets and potentially transferring to the DT’s direct control but also wanted to put it into a heads of terms document with investors and then sort it out later. Which in my mind is a bit appalling as there’s been plenty of time to look at it already, and a ‘heads of terms’ generally isn’t a legally binding document.

whilst I had an occasional run in with Kentish, I found more benefit than anger with posts.

When is Kentish’s ban up?