I remember watching a documentary on BBC iPlayer about Salford being bought by the Class of 92. There were 2 seasons ( [
Link] ) before Sky then took over showing subsequent seasons. I think they may be up to season 7 (not sure as I lost interest after the second season). Like everything else, there will be different views. No doubt these documentaries were biased but even then there were some unhappy with the changes. Some will enjoy the ride, some will miss why they started following their local non-league team. What history has shown us is no matter how self-sufficient a rich owner tries to make a club they have bought and bankrolled, once they stop and sell out it ends in disaster. You cannot artificially buck a club's natural level in the long term. History is littered with club's who have tried, failed and ended up in a worse state than before if they even survived.
Given the choice, if you could have 5 years of promotions before going bust or financial stability with the odd bit of success now and again, what would people choose?